chore(wasm): spelling fixes

Signed-off-by: Xe Iaso <me@xeiaso.net>
This commit is contained in:
Xe Iaso
2025-09-30 20:57:59 +00:00
parent c04bd486e1
commit accffa6d83
3 changed files with 23 additions and 20 deletions

View File

@@ -38,9 +38,21 @@ mod hostimport {
#[cfg(not(target_arch = "wasm32"))]
mod hostimport {
use crate::{DATA_BUFFER, DATA_LENGTH};
pub fn update_nonce(_nonce: u32) {
// This is intentionally blank
}
pub fn data_ptr() -> *const u8 {
let challenge = &DATA_BUFFER;
challenge.as_ptr()
}
pub fn set_data_length(len: u32) {
let mut data_length = DATA_LENGTH.lock().unwrap();
*data_length = len as usize;
}
}
/// The data buffer is a bit weird in that it doesn't have an explicit length as it can
@@ -57,4 +69,4 @@ mod hostimport {
pub static DATA_BUFFER: LazyLock<[u8; 4096]> = LazyLock::new(|| [0; 4096]);
pub static DATA_LENGTH: LazyLock<Mutex<usize>> = LazyLock::new(|| Mutex::new(0));
pub use hostimport::update_nonce;
pub use hostimport::{data_ptr, set_data_length, update_nonce};

View File

@@ -55,10 +55,12 @@ fn anubis_work_inner(
let data = &DATA_BUFFER;
let data_len = *DATA_LENGTH.lock().unwrap();
let data_slice = &data[..data_len];
let mut i = 0;
let h = HashX::new(data_slice)?;
loop {
i += 1;
let hash = h.hash_to_bytes(nonce as u64);
if validate(&hash, difficulty) {
@@ -69,24 +71,18 @@ fn anubis_work_inner(
return Ok(nonce);
}
let old_nonce = nonce;
nonce = nonce.wrapping_add(iterand);
// send a progress update every 1024 iterations. since each thread checks
// separate values, one simple way to do this is by bit masking the
// nonce for multiples of 1024. unfortunately, if the number of threads
// is not prime, only some of the threads will be sending the status
// update and they will get behind the others. this is slightly more
// complicated but ensures an even distribution between threads.
if nonce > old_nonce | 1023 && (nonce >> 10) % iterand == initial_nonce {
if i == 1024 {
update_nonce(nonce);
i = 0;
}
}
}
/// This function is the main entrypoint for the Anubis proof of work implementation.
///
/// This expects `DATA_BUFFER` to be pre-populated with the challenge value as "raw bytes".
/// This expects `DATA_BUFFER` to be prepopulated with the challenge value as "raw bytes".
/// The definition of what goes in the data buffer is an exercise for the implementor, but
/// for SHA-256 we store the hash as "raw bytes". The data buffer is intentionally oversized
/// so that the challenge value can be expanded in the future.

View File

@@ -62,7 +62,6 @@ fn compute_hash(nonce: u32) -> [u8; 32] {
let data = &DATA_BUFFER;
let data_len = *DATA_LENGTH.lock().unwrap();
let use_le = data[data_len - 1] >= 128;
let data_slice = &data[..data_len];
let mut hasher = Sha256::new();
@@ -77,7 +76,7 @@ fn compute_hash(nonce: u32) -> [u8; 32] {
/// This function is the main entrypoint for the Anubis proof of work implementation.
///
/// This expects `DATA_BUFFER` to be pre-populated with the challenge value as "raw bytes".
/// This expects `DATA_BUFFER` to be prepopulated with the challenge value as "raw bytes".
/// The definition of what goes in the data buffer is an exercise for the implementor, but
/// for SHA-256 we store the hash as "raw bytes". The data buffer is intentionally oversized
/// so that the challenge value can be expanded in the future.
@@ -96,8 +95,10 @@ fn compute_hash(nonce: u32) -> [u8; 32] {
#[unsafe(no_mangle)]
pub extern "C" fn anubis_work(difficulty: u32, initial_nonce: u32, iterand: u32) -> u32 {
let mut nonce = initial_nonce;
let mut i = 0;
loop {
i += 1;
let hash = compute_hash(nonce);
if validate(&hash, difficulty) {
@@ -108,17 +109,11 @@ pub extern "C" fn anubis_work(difficulty: u32, initial_nonce: u32, iterand: u32)
return nonce;
}
let old_nonce = nonce;
nonce = nonce.wrapping_add(iterand);
// send a progress update every 1024 iterations. since each thread checks
// separate values, one simple way to do this is by bit masking the
// nonce for multiples of 1024. unfortunately, if the number of threads
// is not prime, only some of the threads will be sending the status
// update and they will get behind the others. this is slightly more
// complicated but ensures an even distribution between threads.
if nonce > old_nonce | 1023 && (nonce >> 10) % iterand == initial_nonce {
if i == 1024 {
update_nonce(nonce);
i = 0;
}
}
}